14 August 2019

Patriarchal Systems, or, A Call for Confession and Repentance


Where I find myself today

Today I am tackling patriarchal systems. I've recently wrestled with patriarchal systems in a way that has been especially difficult for me, and other people involved have had difficulty understanding how toxic masculinity, sexism, and patriarchy are operating in these contexts.

So, in this instance, patriarchy refers to the religious, social, cultural, and political power nexus that has developed in order to maintain the dominance of straight, cis, white adult men and subjugate women, children, and people of color. Patriarchal systems are so deeply ingrained in our culture that they organize almost every aspect of our lives. In some cases, manifestations of patriarchy in these systems are quite obvious (think of a CEO denying the intelligence or aptitude of women, for example), which makes naming and opposing them at the surface level a relatively straightforward endeavor (relatively).

The more insidious manifestations of patriarchy that we face, however, operate at subtler level. The most difficult personal experience I have had naming and attempting to dismantle patriarchy was in a relatively progressive context, where individuals often protested loudly against such overt expressions of sexism as my generic example above. Much like with racism, and patriarchy and racism are so closely intertwined, people find it much easier to publicly denounce examples of overt discrimination and vitriol while tokenizing members of oppressed groups than to engage in careful self-examination that would require vulnerability and humility.

In these contexts, patriarchy has been ingrained into cultures and systems at a very deep level. Recognizing the ways that white male domination has suffused society with the tools of suppression and control requires that we as people be willing to recognize our own participation in these systems, confess this sin, accept that existing systems need to be transformed or replaced, and follow the leadership of people already doing that liberating work.

How does patriarchy work?

Patriarchy is a manifestation of toxic masculinity, asserting dominance and control over people, things, ideas, nature, and ideas through political systems. Socialization and cultural conditioning are essential for the continued success of patriarchal structures; patriarchal structures are a form of "power over" (see VeneKlasen and Miller, A New Weave of Power), and as such are both rigidly strong and also vulnerable and brittle in their inflexibility. Their strength comes from cultural norms that discourage the questioning of authority, normalize secrecy, establish unquestioned protocols, and inspire shame in those who do not conform; people living in these systems are given false, misleading, or flawed reasons for why the system operates as it does and are not permitted to seriously question the system. Patriarchal structures are often organized through hierarchies that offer false promises of reward and upward mobility to those who can successfully navigate them. At the root of the desire to dominate and control is a deep sense of entitlement; that the individuals deserve to exert their power over others, either inherently or through a self-constructed idea of "merit" that allows them to say that they have "earned" their positions of power.

In order to sustain themselves, Patriarchal systems also require representatives of oppressed groups to invest in their structures, often providing small rewards to tokenized individuals who successfully navigate them. As these individuals from marginalized groups gather up the crumbs dropped from the table of patriarchy, they act as a buffer between those who truly hold power and the marginalized people who challenge these systems.

Patriarchy that feels its own vulnerability relies heavily on theatrical demonstrations intended to discredit its critics. These theatrics make a show of highlighting the voices of people who might object to whatever matter is currently at hand. The system can then nod its head and say "I hear you" before paternalistically guiding the group over which it has power back to the system's original plans and goals. Leaders within patriarchal systems use a variety of tools to discredit dissenting voices in a way that makes their broader audience feel comfortable with the patriarchy, including Othering the dissenter, disparaging the dissenters concerns, rendering the dissenter absurd through accusations of exaggeration, offering to address the dissenter's concerns if they just "go along with it" for now, etc. (there is a music history lesson about the neutralization of politically subversive opera characters in here, but that may be a little too far down the rabbit hole)

When the astute observer objects to policies or practices that continue to exert dominance and control for the continued benefit of those who have always held power, they are pointed back to the exercise where a dissenting voice was showcased, and then reminded that the group decided to approve or implement or affirm the policy or practice in question. Fox News has used this tactic frequently, highlighting the voices of Democratic leaders and pundits, only to steer their audience back to a far-right understanding of the world, and wasn't that Democrat just so crazy for thinking differently and don't we know better than that?

When confronted or challenged, Patriarchal systems react violently in attempts to undermine, discredit, and expel perceived threats to the power structure. Dissenters may be gaslighted in an attempt to undermine their sense of self and degrade their confidence in their own lived experience. The challenger's credibility or competency may be called into question, often ignoring their years of training and experience. A perceived threat may be ostracized by the community, perhaps in the form of being removed from decision-making processes or being excluded from social events in the community. The goal of the system is to neutralize any possible check on its authority through physical, emotional, social, or spiritual force.

What now?

You, whoever you are, have without a doubt been a participant in these patriarchal systems; there is no way to avoid it. Hopefully, that fact makes you uncomfortable. It makes me uncomfortable. It threatens to paralyze me, it works within me to undermine my confidence in myself and causes me to feel as though I am not worthy of participating in the liberating justice work of identifying and opposing patriarchal systems. That is a lie.

I need to reframe the discomfort caused by confronting my complicity in oppression as a divine pull (or push?) to get up and do something. The Christian tradition of confession and repentance reframes this feeling for me; I feel called to confess my complicity in sinful oppression and to repent (as in, turn and change my behavior). I need to use my experience of being a part of oppressive systems to inform and motivate my opposition to them. I also need to join in with others who have already been doing this liberating work and follow their leading. I invite you to do the same.

Thank you

I would like to acknowledge and express gratitude for the people who have helped me better understand these systems and my role in them, as well as my power to oppose them and to follow the leadership of others. Some I have been in close relationships with, others are acquaintances, and others I have only encountered through their written works. At the front of my mind today are my partner, Allison, Renee Kanagy, and Melissa Florer-Bixler, but there are so many more. I have done a very poor job of keeping comprehensive documentation of where I picked up and developed all of the ideas and the understandings I outlined in this post, and for that I apologize. If you as a reader want to share more helpful resources or feel compelled to fill in the gaps with specifics, please do so.

One resource I want to highlight is Peaceful at Heart: Anabaptist Reflections on Healthy Masculinity, edited by Don Neufeld and Steve Thomas. Peaceful at Heart contains thoughts and reflections from a variety of Anabaptist Men that seek to contribute to the conversation around what men can do to confront toxic masculinity and how men can follow the lead of others in this work.

31 March 2018

Easter 2018

"Christ is risen!"
"Christ is risen, indeed!"

On Easter Sunday in Christian communities all over the world, people will be uttering this phrase to one another. Some may do so with a polite smile on their faces, going along with the rest of the room. Others will shout it at their neighbors, nearly deafening them with loud enthusiasm. Yet still others will offer the greeting in whispers as they are overcome the weight of their words, allowing, instead, the sparkle in their eyes to communicate the intensity of the moment. And still there are many more ways to engage in this annual greeting (or more frequent greeting, perhaps, in some circles).

In all of the years I have participated in Easter services that include this greeting, I don't think I have ever experienced a half-hearted or disappointed response to "Christ is risen!" It's happy news; it's a declaration of life; it's victory over evil; it's good news. 

06 January 2016

A Benevolent Epiphany

Below is the sermon I gave at Cincinnati Mennonite Fellowship on January 3 when we celebrated the Epiphany.

Today we celebrate the feast of Epiphany, which is fixed in the church calendar on January 6, twelve days after Christmas. Those of us who grew up near Amish communities may also know of January 6 as Old Christmas, when all the shops closed because their Amish employees took the day off as a holiday. Epiphany closes out the Advent/Christmas season and inaugurates a new season of variable length in its name. The exact length of the Epiphany season is determined by the placement of Easter, which varies from year to year. In days gone by, the season lasted only until Septuagesima, nine weeks before Easter, three before Lent, but in many traditions now stretches on through Transfiguration Sunday or Ash Wednesday. By its inconsistent length, it would appear that Epiphany has served somewhat of a functional role in church history, filling in the gap between the feast of Epiphany and countdown to Easter.

15 November 2015

Je suis Paris; je suis le monde

Below is my opening meditation and prayer from Cincinnati Mennonite Fellowship on November 15, 2015.

Today we come together to celebrate life and to mourn death. As many of us probably know, Paris was attacked last Friday evening. I have to tell you I have mixed feelings about talking about this. I have mixed feelings because Beirut, Lebanon was attacked by suicide bombers Thursday, and I didn't even notice. Another suicide bomber attacked a funeral in Baghdad on Friday, and I didn't know. Garissa University in Kenya suffered an attack with a similar death toll months ago and I had no idea until last night. The U.S. is still conducting drone strikes and other military operations that take human lives. Human lives that shouldn't have to be qualified with the terms "innoncent" or "guilty," but human lives that should be valued because they are lives.

14 July 2015

Meditation on Mennonite Church USA Convention 2015

After attending the MC USA 2015 convention, I was scheduled to be the worship leader at church. The service this past Sunday was a lament, of sorts, over the painful decisions that were made at the convention this year. Our congregation found the resolution on membership guidelines particularly upsetting, but we should also not forget the pain that our Palestinian and Israeli brothers and sisters feel over the Palestine and Israel resolution (click here to read the reactions of some Palestinians and Israelis to the decision to table the resolution), as well as that of others who have been hurt by the church, while at the same time not discounting the positive resolutions that were passed.

I am posting my opening meditation from this past Sunday's service below, along with the hymn I used to craft a call to worship.


26 June 2015

Religion and Obergefell et al. v. Hodges

Today's historic Supreme Court decision has thus far received an understandably mixed reception. I have been troubled by those, including dissenting justices, suggesting that religious institutions are now under threat by the decision. All of this in spite of the fact that the decision itself and Justice Roberts' majority opinion carefully protects religion under the first amendment. So let's talk about the rights of religious institutions and what this decision could mean for us as a society.

So, regarding marriage, what rights do religious institutions have? After the civil rights struggle of the mid-twentieth century, churches have to marry people of other races and interracial couples, do they not? And if they can't discriminate based on race, they surely can't discriminate based on religion! So, up to this point, all religious officials have had to marry all opposite-sex couples that have come seeking to be married, correct? WRONG!

11 August 2014

I tawt I taw some inequality!

Recently, as I was staying with my parents for a bit, the internet began having problems. Unable to do anything requiring an internet connection, and with nothing of interest to me on the television, I turned to their DVD of Loony Tunes classics for entertainment. The first disc contains a number of Sylvester and Tweety episodes, which, for several years, have reminded me of my sister's opinion of that type of cartoon. You know, the one where a predator is chasing his prey, only to be outsmarted and usually injured by said prey. Tom and Jerry and the Road Runner and Coyote are two other classic cartoons of this genre.


30 March 2014

Prayer

Last summer, I gave a tour to a nun, Sister Joseph. We had a great time on tour and talked a little bit afterwards. Somehow, prayer came up in our conversation, and Sister Joseph said she would pray for me, because she would think about me, and every time you think about someone, you pray for them. That profound statement has stayed with me ever since.

My understanding of prayer growing up was that prayer was a conscious action. We folded our hands, bowed our heads and prayed. And when we said Amen, the prayer was over; we were no longer praying. Prayer had a distinct beginning and ending, it functioned to give thanks or express concerns, and it had definable limits. But Sister Joseph was hinting at something far deeper, and more powerful.

09 March 2014

Lent

Today, the first Sunday of Lent, I would like to spend some time reflecting. The pastor at my church this morning, Mark, considered the way our ancestors observed (or more accurately, didn't observe) the Lenten season. Could this have been linked to the idea that Lent is a time to remember the pain of Christ? Perhaps these early Anabaptists had no need of such a season, as they were reminded of this pain every day. There was a constant fear of discovery, a constant fear of imprisonment and death. They lived through pain and suffering the entire year as their friends and relatives were taken away, and as they were taken away. They would be burned at the stake,  beheaded, or drowned. The church in this country is relatively removed from this sort of suffering. Perhaps a reminder of this sort of persecution would do us good. Perhaps we should use this Lenten season to remember the intolerance against which our ancestors struggled, rather than perpetrating intolerance against others (particularly the LGBTQ community. See my last post). I plan to spend this season reading through more of the Martyr's Mirror for just this reason.

04 March 2014

Division and Exclusion

Introduction:
The issue of human sexuality has become a major issue of division in the church, more than any I can remember since I became active in the church.  Recently, the Mountain States Mennonite Conference (MSMC) affirmed the ministry of Theda Good (http://www.themennonite.org/issues/16-12/articles/Mountain_States_first_conference_to_license_samesex_pastor). In response, several other conferences wrote letters to the Executive Board (EB), and both directly and indirectly requested that MSMC be removed from Mennonite Church USA (MC USA) (http://www.themennonite.org/issues/17-3/articles/Letters_from_conference_leaders_and_pastors_express_concern_about_Mountain_States_decision).

My first thought on reading this article and the letter from my home conference, signed by people I know and by many leaders from my home area, was to renounce my membership at my home congregation. However, I would not cease attending this congregation when I return, nor would I change the venue of my upcoming wedding. I am a part of this community, and though we disagree on these matters, I want it to be clear that I do not wish to withdraw from the community. This differs from the views expressed in the Ohio Conference letter (http://www.themennonite.org/uploads/File/Ohio%20letter.pdf), which calls for the removal of an entire conference based on such a disagreement.

10 September 2013

Creation and Understanding

I don't find believing in a literal six-day creation story to be necessary to the Christian faith.  I think it runs counter to our understanding of the world and significantly limits the power of God.  What I find to be much more fascinating is the idea that God exists outside of the universe and was able to orchestrate its creation and is able to work very subtly and effectively through existing natural means.

31 August 2013

Dear Congressman (a response to Obama's stance on Syria)

I just listened to President Obama's speech from the Rose Garden, where he very forcefully advocated for the use of force against the Syrian government.  The one good thing he did was allow room for the voice of the American people.  Below is a letter I sent to my congressmen, urging them to oppose the use of force at every turn, and instead advocate for a more productive response which might actually help the people of Syria.  I know that it is unlikely to affect any actual conversation in Congress, but at least we can say that our opinions were heard.  Feel free to use the following letter for yourself, as well.

25 August 2013

US vs. Them: The danger of "isms"

I know that we are now far removed from the 4th of July Holiday, where the people of the United States celebrate the war that removed British rule from its shores (I think any celebration of the loss of human life is detestable) But the problem of nationalism is not limited to one particular time of year.  The problem pervades Western culture so strongly that it has become second nature for many. So I ask you to consider the following statement:

God Bless ____.

What did you fill in the blank with?  Whites? Blacks? Old people? Young people? Men? Women?  Those statements are grossly inappropriate and wrong.  Yet throw in the word America, and it suddenly seems appropriate.  God Bless America.

14 August 2013

That one person

So, in my work, I've interacted with thousands of people and recounted the basic story of Anabaptism, starting with the reformation.

Martin Luther criticized the Catholic church and the pope in 1517, and rather than be executed for heresy, was protected by the nobility of the Holy Roman/German Empire thanks in part to his stance concerning the nobility: that they had the authority to check the power of the church should it become corrupt.  However, not all groups received such treatment.  Starting in 1525, a group of people rebaptized one another in Switzerland, and the movement grew to reject infant baptism, teach pacifism, and denounce the intermingling of the government of man and the church, which was of God.  These beliefs, and several others held by the group, were heresy, and thus punishable by death.  The Anabaptists would be pursued for the next few centuries.  However, this persecution only strengthened the movement and accelerated its growth.  In 1536, Menno Simons left the priesthood in the Netherlands to join the Anabaptists, and became so influential that people began to refer to many Anabaptists as Mennonites.

06 August 2013

Moments of Transcendence

There are times in life when we feel that there is more going on that what we see around us.  Times when we feel part of something larger than the current moment, when the past, present, and future all seem to be one, and we are able to commune with others outside that moment.  These moments transcend time and space and scream "WE ARE ALL CONNECTED!"

Modern science can probably map our brain and see all sorts of weird stuff going on during these moments, and I that is part of the wonder and the mystery.  Science has so many surprises, and there are still many things that make researchers scratch their heads because they don't quite understand why something happens the way it does, and that is so exciting for everyone involved.

04 August 2013

Introduction: Hello!

Hello everyone! I thought I'd start this out with a little introduction to let you know who I am and what this blog is all about.

So, first me.  I am a baptized and self identified Mennonite belonging to MCUSA.  I was drawn into the church in high school by its emphasis on care, love, peace, and social justice.  I am kept there by my strong appreciation for the long tradition of peace in the church and by the connection I feel to Anabaptists who came before me.  I was not born into the Mennonite church.  Growing up, the only thing I would consider Anabaptist about the churches I attended was the practice of adult baptism.  These churches were solidly evangelical (and sadly, in my opinion, many Mennonite congregations have drifted into the trap of evangelicalism).  I feel an aversion towards evangelical churches generally because of the evangelical emphasis on exclusionary doctrines which make it difficult to bear a grace-oriented or humanistic point of view.  While Mennonites are far from perfect, it is where I have chosen to stay because I believe that the people of that tradition are capable of acknowledging their differences and focusing on shared values of peace and justice.

A little bit about my personal understanding of Christian faith:

I think of people as central to Christianity, as all of creation reflects the divine.  Jesus' life and ministry was focused on meeting the everyday needs of the people and standing with these people in opposition to unjust systems.  His teachings and example had very real and tangible effects; he did a lot of healing and comforting and listening and undersranding, and those who wish to follow him should do the same.

And so what am I doing here?  Well, this is my personal blog.  Essentially, I'm looking to talk about theology, books, movies, culture, current events, music, etc…  I don't really have a whole lot of theological training (my degrees are in music) but if thinking about God is theology, then that makes everyone a theologian. Thanks for joining me.